Open library

The library

The essential reading of generative AI and agents, open in a clean reading view, with Meow and Standard summaries when available. No account needed to read.

563 papers · 561 with a Meow summary · 333 posts

The selected papers and blogs: the essential papers of generative AI and agents, and the key lab publications and essays, each with Meow and Standard summaries.

839 of 839 in this collection. Searches titles, authors, labs, arXiv IDs and summaries.

  1. On Data Engineering for Scaling LLM Terminal Capabilities

    Renjie Pi, Grace Lam, Mohammad Shoeybi et al.

    Despite rapid recent progress in the terminal capabilities of large language models, the training data strategies behind state-of-the-art terminal agents remain largely undisclosed. We address this gap through a systematic study of data engineering practices for terminal agents, making two key contributions: (1) **Ter…

    arXiv 2602.21193v1Meow summaryCode
  2. TermiGen: High-Fidelity Environment and Robust Trajectory Synthesis for Terminal Agents

    Kaijie Zhu, Yuzhou Nie, Yijiang Li et al.

    Executing complex terminal tasks remains a significant challenge for open-weight LLMs, constrained by two fundamental limitations. First, high-fidelity, executable training environments are scarce: environments synthesized from real-world repositories are not diverse and scalable, while trajectories synthesized by LLM…

    arXiv 2602.07274v1Meow summaryCode
  3. daVinci-Dev: Agent-native Mid-training for Software Engineering

    Ji Zeng, Dayuan Fu, Tiantian Mi et al.

    Recently, the frontier of Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities has shifted from single-turn code generation to agentic software engineering—a paradigm where models autonomously navigate, edit, and test complex repositories. While post-training methods have become the de facto approach for code agents, agentic mid-t…

    arXiv 2601.18418v2Meow summaryCode
  4. EnvScaler: Scaling Tool-Interactive Environments for LLM Agent via Programmatic Synthesis

    Xiaoshuai Song, Haofei Chang, Guanting Dong et al.

    Large language models (LLMs) are expected to be trained to act as agents in various real-world environments, but this process relies on rich and varied tool-interaction sandboxes. However, access to real systems is often restricted; LLM-simulated environments are prone to hallucinations and inconsistencies; and manual…

    arXiv 2601.05808v2Meow summaryCode
  5. VideoChat3:Fully Open Video MLLM for Efficient and Generalist Video Understanding

    Recent advances in video understanding have spanned motion, long video, and streaming interaction, driving this field toward real-world applications. Despite this progress, current open-source models remain limited in several ways. They often struggle to generalize across diverse video types, making them effective onl…

    arXiv 2607.14935v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  6. JoyAI-VL-Interaction: Real-Time Vision-Language Interaction Intelligence

    Dingyu Yao, Junhao Zhou, Chenxu Yang et al.

    Many moments in the real world do not wait for a user to ask. A fire starts on a security monitor, an expression flickers across a video call, or a product a viewer wants flashes by in a livestream. Once missed, the moment is gone, because the physical world does not pause. Yet today’s large models remain mostly turn-…

    arXiv 2606.14777v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  7. A Simple Baseline for Streaming Video Understanding

    Yujiao Shen, Shulin Tian, Jingkang Yang et al.

    Recent streaming video understanding methods increasingly rely on complex memory mechanisms to handle long video streams. We challenge this trend with a simple finding: a sliding-window baseline that feeds only the most recent $N$ frames to an off-the-shelf VLM already matches or surpasses published streaming models.…

    arXiv 2604.02317v1Meow summaryMultimodal
  8. A Very Big Video Reasoning Suite

    Maijunxian Wang, Ruisi Wang, Juyi Lin et al.

    Rapid progress in video models has largely focused on visual quality, leaving their reasoning capabilities underexplored. Video reasoning grounds intelligence in spatiotemporally consistent visual environments that go beyond what text can naturally capture, enabling intuitive reasoning over spatiotemporal structure, s…

    arXiv 2602.20159v4Meow summaryMultimodal
  9. Zooming without Zooming: Region-to-Image Distillation for Fine-Grained Multimodal Perception

    Lai Wei, Liangbo He, Jun Lan et al.

    Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at broad visual understanding but still struggle with fine-grained perception, where decisive evidence is small and easily overwhelmed by global context. Recent “Thinking-with-Images” methods alleviate this by iteratively zooming in and out regions of interest during infe…

    arXiv 2602.11858v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  10. MMFineReason: Closing the Multimodal Reasoning Gap via Open Data-Centric Methods

    Honglin Lin, Zheng Liu, Yun Zhu et al.

    Recent advances in Vision Language Models (VLMs) have driven significant progress in visual reasoning. However, open-source multimodal models still lag behind proprietary systems, largely due to the lack of high-quality reasoning data. Existing datasets offer limited coverage of challenging domains such as STEM diagra…

    arXiv 2601.21821v1Meow summaryMultimodal
  11. BabyVision: Visual Reasoning Beyond Language

    Liang Chen, Weichu Xie, Yiyan Liang et al.

    While humans develop core visual skills long before acquiring language, contemporary Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) still rely heavily on linguistic priors to compensate for their fragile visual understanding. We uncovered a crucial fact: state-of-the-art MLLMs consistently fail on basic visual tasks that humans, even 3-year…

    arXiv 2601.06521v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  12. UniCorn: Towards Self-Improving Unified Multimodal Models through Self-Generated Supervision

    Ruiyan Han, Zhen Fang, Xinyu Sun et al.

    While Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) have achieved remarkable success in cross-modal comprehension, a significant gap persists in their ability to leverage such internal knowledge for high-quality generation. We formalize this discrepancy as Conduction Aphasia, a phenomenon where models accurately interpret multimod…

    arXiv 2601.03193v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  13. From Static Templates to Dynamic Runtime Graphs: A Survey of Workflow Optimization for LLM Agents

    Ling Yue yuel2@rpi.edu, Kushal Raj Bhandari bhandk@rpi.edu, Ching-Yun Ko cyko@ibm.com et al.

    Large language model (LLM)-based systems are becoming increasingly popular for solving tasks by constructing executable workflows that interleave LLM calls, information retrieval, tool use, code execution, memory updates, and verification. This survey reviews recent methods for designing and optimizing such workflows,…

    arXiv 2603.22386v1Meow summaryPerspectives
  14. AI Can Learn Scientific Taste

    Jingqi Tong, Mingzhe Li, Hangcheng Li, Yongzhuo Yang, Yurong Mou,

    Scientific discovery depends on expert judgement and foresight, which we call scientific taste: the ability to judge and propose research ideas with the potential for long-term scientific impact. Scientific taste is largely concentrated among highly experienced researchers, whose expertise is usually limited to a few…

    arXiv 2603.14473v3Meow summaryPerspectives
  15. Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs

    Wei Zhou, Jun Zhou, Haoyu Wang et al.

    Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them, which is essential for a wide range of data-centric applications. Driven by (i) rising demands for application-ready data (e.g., for analytics, visualization, decision-making), (ii) increasingly…

    arXiv 2601.17058v1Meow summaryPerspectives
  16. EnvHarness: Awakening Static Worlds for Agent Learning

    Chengsong Huang, Zifeng Wang, Rujun Han et al.

    LLM agents learn by interacting with environments, yet these environments are hand-built and static: blind to an agent’s weaknesses, and quickly left behind as it improves. While recent environment generation methods attempt to address this, they require domain-specific pipelines, rely on expensive or unreliable verif…

    arXiv 2608.19880v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  17. Seed: Self-Evolving On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    Jinyang Wu , Shuo Yang , Zhengxi Lu, Fan Zhang, Yuhao Shen, Lang Feng,

    Large language models are increasingly trained as interactive agents for long-horizon tasks involving multi-turn interaction, tool use, and environment feedback. Outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) provides a practical optimization paradigm, but its sparse trajectory-level rewards offer limited guidance on inter…

    arXiv 2607.14777v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  18. Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    Zhenyu Hou, Yujiang Li, Jie Tang et al.

    Reinforcement learning (RL) is becoming increasingly important for post-training large language models (LLMs). Previous RL pipelines for LLMs were mostly synchronous and batch-interleaved, which is inefficient for long-horizon agentic tasks. Recently, asynchronous RL has emerged as a more efficient alternative by upda…

    arXiv 2607.07508v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  19. OPID: On-Policy Skill Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    Shuo Yang , Jinyang Wu , Zhengxi Lu, Yuhao Shen, Fan Zhang, Lang Feng,

    Outcome-based reinforcement learning provides a stable optimization backbone for language agents, but its sparse trajectory-level rewards provide little guidance on which intermediate decisions should be reinforced or suppressed. On-policy self-distillation offers dense token-level supervision, yet existing skill-cond…

    arXiv 2606.26790v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  20. Self-Distilled Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    Zhengxi Lu, Zhiyuan Yao, Zhuowen Han, Zi-Han Wang, Jinyang Wu

    Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a central paradigm for post-training LLM agents, yet its trajectory-level reward signal provides only coarse supervision for long-horizon interaction. On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) complements RL by introducing dense token-level guidance from a teacher branch augmented w…

    arXiv 2605.15155v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  21. Skill1: Unified Evolution of Skill-Augmented Agents via Reinforcement Learning

    Yaorui Shi, Yuxin Chen, Zhengxi Lu et al.

    A persistent skill library allows language model agents to reuse successful strategies across tasks. Maintaining such a library requires three coupled capabilities. The agent selects a relevant skill, utilizes it during execution, and distills new skills from experience. Existing methods optimize these capabilities in…

    arXiv 2605.06130v3Meow summaryTraining agents
  22. Skill0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization

    Zhengxi Lu, Zhiyuan Yao, Jinyang Wu, Chengcheng Han, Qi Gu

    Agent skills, structured packages of procedural knowledge and executable resources that agents dynamically load at inference time, have become a reliable mechanism for augmenting LLM agents. Yet inference-time skill augmentation is fundamentally limited: retrieval noise introduces irrelevant guidance, injected skill c…

    arXiv 2604.02268v2Meow summaryTraining agents
  23. HyperAgents

    Jenny Zhang, Bingchen Zhao, Wannan Yang et al.

    Self-improving AI systems aim to reduce reliance on human engineering by learning to improve their own learning and problem-solving processes. Existing approaches to recursive self-improvement typically rely on fixed, handcrafted meta-level mechanisms, which fundamentally limit how fast such systems can improve. The D…

    arXiv 2603.19461v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  24. OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking

    Yinjie Wang, Xuyang Chen, Xiaolong Jin et al.

    Every agent interaction generates a **next-state signal**, namely the user reply, tool output, terminal or GUI state change that follows each action, yet no existing agentic RL system recovers it as a live, online learning source. We present **OpenClaw-RL**, a framework that employs next-state signals to optimize pers…

    arXiv 2603.10165v2Meow summaryTraining agents
  25. Heterogeneous Agent Collaborative Reinforcement Learning

    Zhixia Zhang, Zixuan Huang, Gongxun Li et al.

    We introduce **H**eterogeneous **A**gent **C**ollaborative **R**einforcement **L**earning (**HACRL**), a new Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Reward (RLVR) problem that addresses the inefficiencies of isolated multi-agent on-policy optimization. HACRL enables collaborative optimization with independent execution…

    arXiv 2603.02604v2Meow summaryTraining agents
  26. SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning

    Peng Xia, Jianwen Chen, Hanyang Wang et al.

    Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown stunning results in complex tasks, yet they often operate in isolation, failing to learn from past experiences. Existing memory-based methods primarily store raw trajectories, which are often redundant and noise-heavy. This prevents agents from extracting high-level, reusab…

    arXiv 2602.08234v2Meow summaryTraining agents
  27. Competitive Programming with Large Reasoning Models

    OpenAI

    We show that reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLMs) significantly boosts performance on complex coding and reasoning tasks. Additionally, we compare two general-purpose reasoning models — OpenAI o1 and an early checkpoint of o3 — with a domain-specific system, o1-ioi, which uses hand-engineered…

    arXiv 2502.06807v2Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  28. Why Language Models Hallucinate

    Adam Tauman Kalai, Ofir Nachum, Santosh S. Vempala et al.

    Like students facing hard exam questions, large language models sometimes guess when uncertain, producing plausible yet incorrect statements instead of admitting uncertainty. Such “hallucinations” persist even in state-of-the-art systems and undermine trust. We argue that language models hallucinate because the traini…

    arXiv 2509.04664v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  29. Measuring short-form factuality in large language models

    Jason Wei Nguyen Karina Hyung Won Chung Yunxin Joy Jiao

    We present SimpleQA, a benchmark that evaluates the ability of language models to answer short, fact-seeking questions. We prioritized two properties in designing this eval. First, SimpleQA is challenging, as it is adversarially collected against GPT-4 responses. Second, responses are easy to grade, because questions…

    arXiv 2411.04368v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  30. HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health

    Rahul K. Arora, Jason Wei, Rebecca Soskin Hicks et al.

    We present HealthBench, an open-source benchmark measuring the performance and safety of large language models in healthcare. HealthBench consists of 5,000 multi-turn conversations between a model and an individual user or healthcare professional. Responses are evaluated using conversation-specific rubrics created by…

    arXiv 2505.08775v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  31. Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Gemini Team, Google

    This report introduces a new family of multimodal models, Gemini, that exhibit remarkable capabilities across image, audio, video, and text understanding. The Gemini family consists of Ultra, Pro, and Nano sizes, suitable for applications ranging from complex reasoning tasks to on-device memory-constrained use-cases.…

    arXiv 2312.11805v5Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  32. Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context

    Gemini Team, Google

    In this report, we introduce the Gemini 1.5 family of models, representing the next generation of highly compute-efficient multimodal models capable of recalling and reasoning over fine-grained information from millions of tokens of context, including multiple long documents and hours of video and audio. The family in…

    arXiv 2403.05530v5Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  33. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities.

    Gemini Team, Google

    In this report, we introduce the Gemini 2.X model family: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash, as well as our earlier Gemini 2.0 Flash and Flash-Lite models. Gemini 2.5 Pro is our most capable model yet, achieving SoTA performance on frontier coding and reasoning benchmarks. In addition to its incredible coding and re…

    arXiv 2507.06261v6Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  34. Gemma 3 Technical Report

    Gemma Team, Google DeepMind\authfootnotemark1

    We introduce Gemma 3, a multimodal addition to the Gemma family of lightweight open models, ranging in scale from 1 to 27 billion parameters. This version introduces vision understanding abilities, a wider coverage of languages and longer context – at least 128K tokens. We also change the architecture of the model to…

    arXiv 2503.19786v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  35. Genie: Generative Interactive Environments

    Jake Bruce, Michael Dennis, Ashley Edwards et al.

    We introduce Genie, the first generative interactive environment trained in an unsupervised manner from unlabelled Internet videos. The model can be prompted to generate an endless variety of action-controllable virtual worlds described through text, synthetic images, photographs, and even sketches. At 11B parameters,…

    arXiv 2402.15391v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  36. Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World

    Gemini Robotics Team, Google DeepMind

    Recent advancements in large multimodal models have led to the emergence of remarkable generalist capabilities in digital domains, yet their translation to physical agents such as robots remains a significant challenge. Generally useful robots need to be able to make sense of the physical world around them, and intera…

    arXiv 2503.20020v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports
  37. Mixture-of-Depths: Dynamically allocating compute in transformer-based language models

    David Raposo, Sam Ritter, Blake Richards et al.

    Transformer-based language models spread FLOPs uniformly across input sequences. In this work we demonstrate that transformers can instead learn to dynamically allocate FLOPs (or compute) to specific positions in a sequence, optimising the allocation along the sequence for different layers across the model depth. Our…

    arXiv 2404.02258v1Meow summaryModels & tech reports