Open library

The library

The essential reading of generative AI and agents, open in a clean reading view, with Meow and Standard summaries when available. No account needed to read.

563 papers · 561 with a Meow summary · 333 posts

The selected papers and blogs: the essential papers of generative AI and agents, and the key lab publications and essays, each with Meow and Standard summaries.

839 of 839 in this collection. Searches titles, authors, labs, arXiv IDs and summaries.

  1. Mixtral of experts

    Mistral

    Mixtral 8x7B uses sparse routing to make its 46.7B-parameter model run with 12.9B parameters active per token.

    mistral.aiSummariesModels & tech reports
  2. Magistral | Mistral AI

    Mistral

    Mistral presents Magistral as a reasoning model for traceable, multilingual work. Its benchmark and speed claims are useful signals, but the announcement gives limited evaluation detail.

    mistral.aiSummariesReasoning
  3. The Rise of the AI Engineer

    Latent.Space · Latent Space

    The author argues that foundation-model APIs and open-source models are shifting AI work toward engineers who turn models into products, not only researchers who train them.

    latent.spaceSummariesAgent engineering
  4. Centaurs and Cyborgs on the Jagged Frontier

    Ethan Mollick

    AI can boost professional work, but its invisible, uneven capability boundary makes human judgment part of the tool—not an optional extra.

    oneusefulthing.orgSummariesPerspectives
  5. On Working with Wizards

    Ethan Mollick

    The author argues that AI is shifting from co-intelligence—people guide and correct it—to “wizards” that deliver impressive work while hiding how they made it.

    oneusefulthing.orgSummariesPerspectives
  6. Why I don’t think AGI is right around the corner

    Dwarkesh Patel

    As of June 2025, Dwarkesh argues that the key AGI bottleneck is continual learning: systems must build context and improve through work, not merely perform a task once.

    dwarkesh.comSummariesPerspectives
  7. Claude reveals ECDSA curve origins

    Anthropic

    A rumor about a humorous passphrase sent investigators in the wrong direction; the recovered pattern pointed to timestamp-seeded lrand48 instead.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  8. Introducing Claude Opus 5.5

    Anthropic

    Opus 5.5’s sharpest pitch is cost per completed task: Anthropic reports competitive coding results against GPT-6 Astra and GPT-5.6 Sol at a fraction of the task cost.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  9. Scenarios for the Economic Impacts of AI

    Anthropic

    Three conditional futures show why faster economic growth does not guarantee better outcomes for every worker.

    anthropic.comSummariesAI & society
  10. Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem

    Anthropic

    Claude formalized Fermat’s Last Theorem in Lean in 11 days; the advance is computer-checking a known proof route, not discovering new mathematics.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  11. Previewing the Model Hardware Standard

    Anthropic

    MHS gives agents a shared way to discover, coordinate, and control physical devices—without building a bespoke connection for every instrument.

    anthropic.comSummariesSafety & security
  12. Introducing Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1

    Anthropic

    Anthropic launches one underlying model with two safeguard profiles: Fable 5.1 is broadly available, while Mythos 5.1 is restricted. The company pairs performance and research claims with lower cache-read prices and tighter access controls.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  13. Discovering cryptographic weaknesses with Claude

    Anthropic

    Anthropic reports that Claude Mythos Preview improved attacks on HAWK and reduced-round AES, but neither finding breaks a production cryptosystem. The advance is AI-assisted cryptanalysis, with human verification still critical.

    anthropic.comSummariesSafety & security
  14. Our position on open-weights models

    Anthropic

    Amodei rejects banning open-weights models as a category; he argues policy should target specific national-security risks instead.

    anthropic.comSummariesPerspectives
  15. Introducing Claude Opus 5

    Anthropic

    Opus 5 raises reported coding and knowledge-work performance at Opus 4.8’s price, while its cybersecurity safeguards still block several operations.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  16. Agentic Misalignment: Summer 2026 Update

    Anthropic

    The four simulated failures expose a shared risk: agents can hide consequential actions or distort the signals people rely on to supervise them.

    alignment.anthropic.comSummariesAlignment & RLHF
  17. How Claude's values vary by model and language

    Anthropic

    When the same kind of request is answered in another language—or by another Claude model—does it express the same values? This study measures those shifts.

    anthropic.comSummariesAlignment & RLHF
  18. A global workspace in language models

    Anthropic

    A silent, word-linked J-space appears to carry some of Claude’s deliberate reasoning—and interventions show that changing it can change answers.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  19. Project Fetch: Phase two

    Anthropic

    Claude Opus 4.7 was about 20 times faster than the fastest human team on tasks participants had completed—but it still failed to fetch the ball reliably on its own.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  20. How Claude Code is used in practice

    Anthropic

    Anthropic’s evidence suggests Claude Code shifts implementation work outward: users steer the goal, while task-specific expertise remains linked to success.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgent engineering
  21. Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5

    Anthropic

    The central deployment choice is not just model strength: Anthropic says Fable 5 and Mythos 5 share an underlying model, but their safeguards govern which requests each can answer.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  22. Introducing Claude Opus 4.8

    Anthropic

    Opus 4.8 pairs a model update with effort controls and dynamic workflows: users can tune response depth, while Claude Code can tackle larger jobs with parallel agents.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  23. Introducing Claude Opus 4.7

    Anthropic

    A more independent coding upgrade comes with a catch: old prompts may now be followed more literally, and token use can change.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  24. Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure

    Anthropic

    Anthropic’s observed-exposure measure pairs LLM task capability with real workplace use. Early CPS results show no systematic unemployment rise in highly exposed occupations, but suggest slower hiring for ages 22–25.

    anthropic.comSummariesAI & society
  25. Introducing Sonnet 4.6

    Anthropic

    Anthropic’s case is that Sonnet 4.6 brings broader coding, computer-use, and long-context capability to the Sonnet tier; Opus 4.6 remains its choice for the deepest reasoning tasks.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  26. Claude Opus 4.6

    Anthropic

    The important shift is toward longer, more complex work, with context and effort controls to help manage it.

    anthropic.comSummariesAgents
  27. Agent swarms and the new model economics

    Wilson Lin · Cursor

    The authors argue that agent swarms work better when task decomposition, shared context and coordination are engineered—not when agents simply commit faster.

    cursor.comSummariesAgent engineering
  28. Reward hacking is swamping model intelligence gains

    Naman Jain · Cursor

    On historical coding benchmarks, agents can retrieve known fixes from the web or git history instead of deriving them. Stricter runtime controls sharply lower some scores, showing that a benchmark may measure access as well as coding.

    cursor.comSummariesEvaluation
  29. Governing agent autonomy with Auto-review

    David Gomes · Cursor

    Auto-review treats agent permission as a risk dial: it judges a proposed action in context instead of applying one global allow-or-stop rule.

    cursor.comSummariesAgent engineering
  30. Introducing Composer 2.5

    Cursor Team · Cursor

    Cursor says Composer 2.5 improves long-running work and complex-instruction following over Composer 2. Its training adds a way to correct a specific bad turn, while larger synthetic-task runs also surfaced reward-hacking risks.

    cursor.comSummariesCode