Open library

The library

The essential reading of generative AI and agents, open in a clean reading view, with Meow and Standard summaries when available. No account needed to read.

563 papers · 561 with a Meow summary · 333 posts

The papers that shaped today’s generative AI, agent research and agent engineering, from word vectors to agentic RL.

387 of 387 in this collection. Searches titles, authors, labs, arXiv IDs and summaries.

  1. Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate

    Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba et al.

    Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in language generation, understanding, and few-shot learning in recent years. An extensive body of work has explored how their performance may be further improved through the tools of prompting, ranging from verification, self-consistency, or inter…

    arXiv 2305.14325v1Meow summaryAgents
  2. Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities

    Junlin Wang, Jue Wang, Ben Athiwaratkun et al.

    Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) demonstrate substantial capabilities in natural language understanding and generation tasks. With the growing number of LLMs, how to harness the collective expertise of multiple LLMs is an exciting open direction. Toward this goal, we propose a new approach that leverage…

    arXiv 2406.04692v1Meow summaryAgents
  3. Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models

    Qizheng Zhang, Changran Hu, Shubhangi Upasani et al.

    Large language model (LLM) applications such as agents and domain-specific reasoning increasingly rely on context adaptation: modifying inputs with instructions, strategies, or evidence, rather than weight updates. Prior approaches improve usability but often suffer from brevity bias, which drops domain insights for c…

    arXiv 2510.04618v3Meow summaryAgents
  4. SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering

    John Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig et al.

    Language model (LM) agents are increasingly being used to automate complicated tasks in digital environments. Just as humans benefit from powerful software applications, such as integrated development environments, for complex tasks like software engineering, we posit that LM agents represent a new category of end use…

    arXiv 2405.15793v3Meow summaryAgents
  5. OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents

    Xingyao Wang, Boxuan Li, Yufan Song et al.

    Software is one of the most powerful tools that we humans have at our disposal; it allows a skilled programmer to interact with the world in complex and profound ways. At the same time, thanks to improvements in large language models (LLMs), there has also been a rapid development in AI agents that interact with and a…

    arXiv 2407.16741v3Meow summaryAgents
  6. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks

    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler et al.

    Large pre-trained language models have been shown to store factual knowledge in their parameters, and achieve state-of-the-art results when fine-tuned on downstream NLP tasks. However, their ability to access and precisely manipulate knowledge is still limited, and hence on knowledge-intensive tasks, their performance…

    arXiv 2005.11401v4Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  7. REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training

    Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung et al.

    Language model pre-training has been shown to capture a surprising amount of world knowledge, crucial for NLP tasks such as question answering. However, this knowledge is stored implicitly in the parameters of a neural network, requiring ever-larger networks to cover more facts. To capture knowledge in a more modular…

    arXiv 2002.08909v1Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  8. Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering

    Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oğuz, Sewon Min et al.

    Open-domain question answering relies on efficient passage retrieval to select candidate contexts, where traditional sparse vector space models, such as TF-IDF or BM25, are the de facto method. In this work, we show that retrieval can be practically implemented using dense representations alone, where embeddings are l…

    arXiv 2004.04906v3Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  9. Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering

    Gautier Izacard, Edouard Grave

    Generative models for open domain question answering have proven to be competitive, without resorting to external knowledge. While promising, this approach requires to use models with billions of parameters, which are expensive to train and query. In this paper, we investigate how much these models can benefit from re…

    arXiv 2007.01282v2Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  10. ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT

    Omar Khattab, Matei Zaharia

    Recent progress in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) is driving fast-paced advances in Information Retrieval (IR), largely owed to fine-tuning deep language models (LMs) for document ranking. While remarkably effective, the ranking models based on these LMs increase computational cost by orders of magnitude over pr…

    arXiv 2004.12832v2Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  11. Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels

    Luyu Gao, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin et al.

    While dense retrieval has been shown effective and efficient across tasks and languages, it remains difficult to create effective fully zero-shot dense retrieval systems when no relevance label is available. In this paper, we recognize the difficulty of zero-shot learning and encoding relevance. Instead, we propose to…

    arXiv 2212.10496v1Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  12. RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval

    Parth Sarthi, Salman Abdullah, Aditi Tuli et al.

    Retrieval-augmented language models can better adapt to changes in world state and incorporate long-tail knowledge. However, most existing methods retrieve only short contiguous chunks from a retrieval corpus, limiting holistic understanding of the overall document context. We introduce the novel approach of recursive…

    arXiv 2401.18059v1Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  13. Self-rag: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection

    Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang et al.

    Despite their remarkable capabilities, large language models (LLMs) often produce responses containing factual inaccuracies due to their sole reliance on the parametric knowledge they encapsulate. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), an ad hoc approach that augments LMs with retrieval of relevant knowledge, decreases…

    arXiv 2310.11511v1Meow summaryRetrieval & memory
  14. Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding

    Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart et al.

    We propose a new test to measure a text model’s multitask accuracy. The test covers 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and more. To attain high accuracy on this test, models must possess extensive world knowledge and problem solving ability. We find that while most recent mod…

    arXiv 2009.03300v3Meow summaryEvaluation
  15. Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models

    Alphabetic author list

    Language models demonstrate both quantitative improvement and new qualitative capabilities with increasing scale. Despite their potentially transformative impact, these new capabilities are as yet poorly characterized. In order to inform future research, prepare for disruptive new model capabilities, and ameliorate so…

    arXiv 2206.04615v3Meow summaryEvaluation
  16. GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark

    David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland et al.

    We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality and extremely difficult: experts who have or are pursuing PhDs in the corresponding domains reach 65% accuracy (74% when discounting clear…

    arXiv 2311.12022v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  17. Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset

    Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath et al.

    Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of $12,\!500$ challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step so…

    arXiv 2103.03874v2Meow summaryEvaluation
  18. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods

    Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain Evans

    We propose a benchmark to measure whether a language model is truthful in generating answers to questions. The benchmark comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. We crafted questions that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception. To pe…

    arXiv 2109.07958v2Meow summaryEvaluation
  19. Humanity’s Last Exam

    Benchmarks are important tools for tracking the rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, benchmarks are not keeping pace in difficulty: LLMs now achieve over 90% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU, limiting informed measurement of state-of-the-art LLM capabilities. In response, we…

    arXiv 2501.14249v12Meow summaryEvaluation
  20. Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference

    Wei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng et al.

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have unlocked new capabilities and applications; however, evaluating the alignment with human preferences still poses significant challenges. To address this issue, we introduce Chatbot Arena, an open platform for evaluating LLMs based on human preferences. Our methodology employs a pairwi…

    arXiv 2403.04132v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  21. LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark

    Colin White, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts et al.

    Test set contamination, wherein test data from a benchmark ends up in a newer model’s training set, is a well-documented obstacle for fair LLM evaluation and can quickly render benchmarks obsolete. To mitigate this, many recent benchmarks crowdsource new prompts and evaluations from human or LLM judges; however, these…

    arXiv 2406.19314v2Meow summaryEvaluation
  22. τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains

    Shunyu Yao, Noah Shinn, Pedram Razavi et al.

    Existing benchmarks do not test language agents on their interaction with human users or ability to follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital for deploying them in real world applications. We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and…

    arXiv 2406.12045v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  23. τ²-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment

    Victor Barres, Honghua Dong, Soham Ray et al.

    Existing benchmarks for conversational AI agents simulate single-control environments, where only the AI agent can use tools to interact with the world, while the user remains a passive information provider. This differs from real-world scenarios like technical support, where users need to actively participate in modi…

    arXiv 2506.07982v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  24. WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents

    Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Xuhui Zhou et al.

    With advances in generative AI, there is now potential for autonomous agents to manage daily tasks via natural language commands. However, current agents are primarily created and tested in simplified synthetic environments, leading to a disconnect with real-world scenarios. In this paper, we build an environment for…

    arXiv 2307.13854v4Meow summaryEvaluation
  25. Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web

    Xiang Deng, Yu Gu, Boyuan Zheng et al.

    We introduce Mind2Web, the first dataset for developing and evaluating generalist agents for the web that can follow language instructions to complete complex tasks on any website. Existing datasets for web agents either use simulated websites or only cover a limited set of websites and tasks, thus not suitable for ge…

    arXiv 2306.06070v3Meow summaryEvaluation
  26. WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents

    Shunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang et al.

    Existing benchmarks for grounding language in interactive environments either lack real-world linguistic elements, or prove difficult to scale up due to substantial human involvement in the collection of data or feedback signals. To bridge this gap, we develop WebShop – a simulated e-commerce website environment with…

    arXiv 2207.01206v4Meow summaryEvaluation
  27. OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments

    Tianbao Xie Danyang Zhang Jixuan Chen Xiaochuan Li Siheng Zhao, Ruisheng Cao Toh Jing Hua Zhoujun Cheng Dongchan Shin Fangyu Lei Yitao Liu, Yiheng Xu Shuyan Zhou Silvio Savarese Caiming Xiong Victor Zhong Tao Yu

    Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to ce…

    arXiv 2404.07972v2Meow summaryEvaluation
  28. GAIA: A Benchmark for General AI Assistants

    Grégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Craig Swift et al.

    We introduce GAIA, a benchmark for General AI Assistants that, if solved, would represent a milestone in AI research. GAIA proposes real-world questions that require a set of fundamental abilities such as reasoning, multi-modality handling, web browsing, and generally tool-use proficiency. GAIA questions are conceptua…

    arXiv 2311.12983v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  29. MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering

    Chan Jun Shern, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe et al.

    We introduce MLE-bench, a benchmark for measuring how well AI agents perform at machine learning engineering. To this end, we curate 75 ML engineering-related competitions from Kaggle, creating a diverse set of challenging tasks that test real-world ML engineering skills such as training models, preparing datasets, an…

    arXiv 2410.07095v6Meow summaryEvaluation
  30. Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks

    Thomas Kwa, Ben West, Joel Becker et al.

    Despite rapid progress on AI benchmarks, the real-world meaning of benchmark performance remains unclear. To quantify the capabilities of AI systems in terms of human capabilities, we propose a new metric: 50%-task-completion time horizon, the time humans typically take to complete tasks that AI models can complete wi…

    arXiv 2503.14499v4Meow summaryEvaluation
  31. BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents

    Jason Wei Zhiqing Sun Spencer Papay

    We present BrowseComp, a simple yet challenging benchmark for measuring the ability for agents to browse the web. BrowseComp comprises 1,266 questions that require persistently navigating the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and ea…

    arXiv 2504.12516v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  32. WebVoyager : Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Models

    Hongliang He, Wenlin Yao, Kaixin Ma et al.

    The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to a new era marked by the development of autonomous applications in real-world scenarios, which drives innovation in creating advanced web agents. Existing web agents typically only handle one input modality and are evaluated only in simplified web simulat…

    arXiv 2401.13919v4Meow summaryEvaluation
  33. Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

    Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun et al.

    We introduce Codex, a GPT language model fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub, and study its Python code-writing capabilities. A distinct production version of Codex powers GitHub Copilot. On [HumanEval](https://github.com/openai/human-eval), a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctne…

    arXiv 2107.03374v2Meow summaryEvaluation
  34. Program Synthesis with Large Language Models

    Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye et al.

    This paper explores the limits of the current generation of large language models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages. We evaluate a collection of such models (with between 244M and 137B parameters) on two new benchmarks, MBPP and MathQA-Python, in both the few-shot and fine-tuning regimes.…

    arXiv 2108.07732v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  35. LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code

    Naman Jain, King Han, Alex Gu et al.

    Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to code-related applications have emerged as a prominent field, attracting significant interest from both academia and industry. However, as new and improved LLMs are developed, existing evaluation benchmarks (e.g., HumanEval, MBPP) are no longer sufficient for assessing their capa…

    arXiv 2403.07974v2Meow summaryEvaluation
  36. Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode

    Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung et al.

    Programming is a powerful and ubiquitous problem-solving tool. Developing systems that can assist programmers or even generate programs independently could make programming more productive and accessible, yet so far incorporating innovations in AI has proven challenging. Recent large-scale language models have demonst…

    arXiv 2203.07814v1Meow summaryCode
  37. StarCoder: may the source be with you!

    The BigCode community, an open-scientific collaboration working on the responsible development of Large Language Models for Code (Code LLMs), introduces StarCoder and StarCoderBase: 15.5B parameter models with 8K context length, infilling capabilities and fast large-batch inference enabled by multi-query attention. St…

    arXiv 2305.06161v2Meow summaryCode
  38. Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code

    Baptiste Rozière, Jonas Gehring, Fabian Gloeckle et al.

    We release Code Llama, a family of large language models for code based on Llama 2 providing state-of-the-art performance among open models, infilling capabilities, support for large input contexts, and zero-shot instruction following ability for programming tasks. We provide multiple flavors to cover a wide range of…

    arXiv 2308.12950v3Meow summaryCode
  39. Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning

    Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc et al.

    Building models that can be rapidly adapted to novel tasks using only a handful of annotated examples is an open challenge for multimodal machine learning research. We introduce Flamingo, a family of Visual Language Models (VLM) with this ability. We propose key architectural innovations to: (i) bridge powerful pretra…

    arXiv 2204.14198v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  40. BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese et al.

    The cost of vision-and-language pre-training has become increasingly prohibitive due to end-to-end training of large-scale models. This paper proposes BLIP-2, a generic and efficient pre-training strategy that bootstraps vision-language pre-training from off-the-shelf frozen pre-trained image encoders and frozen large…

    arXiv 2301.12597v3Meow summaryMultimodal