Open library

The library

The essential reading of generative AI and agents, open in a clean reading view, with Meow and Standard summaries when available. No account needed to read.

563 papers · 561 with a Meow summary · 333 posts

The selected papers and blogs: the essential papers of generative AI and agents, and the key lab publications and essays, each with Meow and Standard summaries.

839 of 839 in this collection. Searches titles, authors, labs, arXiv IDs and summaries.

  1. Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li et al.

    Large multimodal models (LMM) have recently shown encouraging progress with visual instruction tuning. In this paper, we present the first systematic study to investigate the design choices of LMMs in a controlled setting under the LLaVA framework. We show that the fully-connected vision-language connector in LLaVA is…

    arXiv 2310.03744v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  2. Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu et al.

    We study the capabilities of speech processing systems trained simply to predict large amounts of transcripts of audio on the internet. When scaled to 680,000 hours of multilingual and multitask supervision, the resulting models generalize well to standard benchmarks and are often competitive with prior fully supervis…

    arXiv 2212.04356v1Meow summaryMultimodal
  3. Segment Anything

    Alexander Kirillov Eric Mintun Nikhila Ravi Hanzi Mao Chloe Rolland Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao Spencer Whitehead Alexander C. Berg Wan-Yen Lo Piotr Dollár Ross Girshick

    We introduce the Segment Anything (SA) project: a new task, model, and dataset for image segmentation. Using our efficient model in a data collection loop, we built the largest segmentation dataset to date (by far), with over 1 **billion** masks on 11M licensed and privacy respecting images. The model is designed and…

    arXiv 2304.02643v1Meow summaryMultimodal
  4. SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu et al.

    We present Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2), a foundation model towards solving promptable visual segmentation in images and videos. We build a data engine, which improves model and data via user interaction, to collect the largest video segmentation dataset to date. Our model is a simple transformer architecture with…

    arXiv 2408.00714v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  5. DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

    Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni,Huy V. Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza,Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Mahmoud Assran, Nicolas Ballas, Wojciech Galuba,Russell Howes, Po-Yao Huang, Shang-Wen Li, Ishan Misra, Michael Rabbat, Vasu Sharma, Gabriel Synnaeve et al.

    The recent breakthroughs in natural language processing for model pretraining on large quantities of data have opened the way for similar foundation models in computer vision. These models could greatly simplify the use of images in any system by producing general-purpose visual features, i.e., features that work acro…

    arXiv 2304.07193v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  6. Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models

    Chameleon Team

    We present Chameleon, a family of early-fusion token-based mixed-modal models capable of understanding and generating images and text in any arbitrary sequence. We outline a stable training approach from inception, an alignment recipe, and an architectural parameterization tailored for the early-fusion, token-based, m…

    arXiv 2405.09818v2Meow summaryMultimodal
  7. Transfusion: Predict the Next Token and Diffuse Images with One Multi-Modal Model

    Chunting Zhou, Lili Yu, Arun Babu et al.

    We introduce Transfusion, a recipe for training a multi-modal model over discrete and continuous data. Transfusion combines the language modeling loss function (next token prediction) with diffusion to train a single transformer over mixed-modality sequences. We pretrain multiple Transfusion models up to 7B parameters…

    arXiv 2408.11039v1Meow summaryMultimodal
  8. RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal et al.

    We study how vision-language models trained on Internet-scale data can be incorporated directly into end-to-end robotic control to boost generalization and enable emergent semantic reasoning. Our goal is to enable a single end-to-end trained model to both learn to map robot observations to actions and enjoy the benefi…

    arXiv 2307.15818v1Meow summaryMultimodal
  9. π₀: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    Physical Intelligence

    Robot learning holds tremendous promise to unlock the full potential of flexible, general, and dexterous robot systems, as well as to address some of the deepest questions in artificial intelligence. However, bringing robot learning to the level of generality required for effective real-world systems faces major obsta…

    arXiv 2410.24164v4Meow summaryMultimodal
  10. OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti et al.

    Large policies pretrained on a combination of Internet-scale vision-language data and diverse robot demonstrations have the potential to change how we teach robots new skills: rather than training new behaviors from scratch, we can fine-tune such vision-language-action (VLA) models to obtain robust, generalizable poli…

    arXiv 2406.09246v3Meow summaryMultimodal
  11. Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT

    Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian et al.

    We analyze the storage and recall of factual associations in autoregressive transformer language models, finding evidence that these associations correspond to localized, directly-editable computations. We first develop a causal intervention for identifying neuron activations that are decisive in a model’s factual pre…

    arXiv 2202.05262v5Meow summaryInterpretability
  12. Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small

    Kevin Wang, Alexandre Variengien, Arthur Conmy, Buck Shlegeris & Jacob Steinhardt

    Research in mechanistic interpretability seeks to explain behaviors of machine learning (ML) models in terms of their internal components. However, most previous work either focuses on simple behaviors in small models or describes complicated behaviors in larger models with broad strokes. In this work, we bridge this…

    arXiv 2211.00593v1Meow summaryInterpretability
  13. Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability

    Arthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch et al.

    Through considerable effort and intuition, several recent works have reverse-engineered nontrivial behaviors of transformer models. This paper systematizes the mechanistic interpretability process they followed. First, researchers choose a metric and dataset that elicit the desired model behavior. Then, they apply act…

    arXiv 2304.14997v4Meow summaryInterpretability
  14. Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency

    Andy Zou, Long Phan, Sarah Chen et al.

    We identify and characterize the emerging area of representation engineering (RepE), an approach to enhancing the transparency of AI systems that draws on insights from cognitive neuroscience. RepE places representations, rather than neurons or circuits, at the center of analysis, equipping us with novel methods for m…

    arXiv 2310.01405v4Meow summaryInterpretability
  15. Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision

    Collin Burns, Haotian Ye, Dan Klein et al.

    Existing techniques for training language models can be misaligned with the truth: if we train models with imitation learning, they may reproduce errors that humans make; if we train them to generate text that humans rate highly, they may output errors that human evaluators can’t detect. We propose circumventing this…

    arXiv 2212.03827v2Meow summaryInterpretability
  16. Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders

    Leo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman et al.

    Sparse autoencoders provide a promising unsupervised approach for extracting interpretable features from a language model by reconstructing activations from a sparse bottleneck layer. Since language models learn many concepts, autoencoders need to be very large to recover all relevant features. However, studying the p…

    arXiv 2406.04093v1Meow summaryInterpretability
  17. The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in LLM Representations of True/False Datasets

    Samuel Marks, Max Tegmark

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities, but are prone to outputting falsehoods. Recent work has developed techniques for inferring whether a LLM is telling the truth by training probes on the LLM’s internal activations. However, this line of work is controversial, with some authors pointing out fail…

    arXiv 2310.06824v3Meow summaryInterpretability
  18. Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction

    Andy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed et al.

    Conversational large language models are fine-tuned for both instruction-following and safety, resulting in models that obey benign requests but refuse harmful ones. While this refusal behavior is widespread across chat models, its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we show that refusal is m…

    arXiv 2406.11717v3Meow summaryInterpretability
  19. Position: Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI

    Meredith Ringel Morris, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Noah Fiedel et al.

    We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to A…

    arXiv 2311.02462v5Meow summaryPerspectives
  20. SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents

    John Yang, Kilian Lieret, Carlos E. Jimenez et al.

    Despite recent progress in Language Models (LMs) for software engineering, collecting training data remains a significant pain point. Existing datasets are small, with at most $1{,}000$s of training instances from $11$ or fewer GitHub repositories. The procedures to curate such datasets are often complex, necessitatin…

    arXiv 2504.21798v2Meow summaryTraining agents
  21. R2E-Gym: Procedural Environments and Hybrid Verifiers for Scaling Open-Weights SWE Agents

    Naman Jain Jaskirat Singh Manish Shetty Liang Zheng Koushik Sen Ion Stoica

    Improving open-source models on real-world Swe tasks (solving GitHub issues) faces two key challenges: 1) scalable curation of execution environments to train these models, and 2) optimal scaling of test-time compute. We introduce R2E-Gym, the largest procedurally-curated executable gym environment for training real-w…

    arXiv 2504.07164v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  22. Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym

    Jiayi Pan, Xingyao Wang, Graham Neubig et al.

    We present SWE-Gym, the first environment for training software engineering (SWE) agents. SWE-Gym contains 2,438 real-world task instances, each comprising a Python codebase with an executable runtime environment, unit tests, and a task specified in natural language. We use SWE-Gym to train language model based SWE ag…

    arXiv 2412.21139v2Meow summaryTraining agents
  23. The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey

    Guibin Zhang, Hejia Geng, Xiaohang Yu et al.

    The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL), reframing LLMs from passive sequence generators into autonomous, decision-making agents embedded in complex, dynamic worlds. This survey formalizes thi…

    arXiv 2509.02547v5Meow summaryTraining agents
  24. AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery

    Alexander Novikov, Ngân Vũ, Marvin Eisenberger et al.

    In this white paper, we present AlphaEvolve, an evolutionary coding agent that substantially enhances capabilities of state-of-the-art LLMs on highly challenging tasks such as tackling open scientific problems or optimizing critical pieces of computational infrastructure. AlphaEvolve orchestrates an autonomous pipelin…

    arXiv 2506.13131v1Meow summaryAgents
  25. Darwin Gödel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents

    Jenny Zhang, Shengran Hu, Cong Lu et al.

    Most of today’s AI systems are constrained by human-designed, fixed architectures and cannot autonomously and continuously improve themselves. The scientific method, on the other hand, is a cumulative and open-ended system, where each innovation builds upon previous artifacts, enabling future discoveries. There is gro…

    arXiv 2505.22954v3Meow summaryAgents
  26. Agent Workflow Memory

    Zora Zhiruo Wang, Jiayuan Mao, Daniel Fried et al.

    Despite the potential of language model-based agents to solve real-world tasks such as web navigation, current methods still struggle with long-horizon tasks with complex action trajectories. In contrast, humans can flexibly solve complex tasks by learning reusable task workflows from past experiences and using them t…

    arXiv 2409.07429v1Meow summaryAgents
  27. A-Mem: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents

    Wujiang Xu, Zujie Liang, Kai Mei et al.

    While large language model (LLM) agents can effectively use external tools for complex real-world tasks, they require memory systems to leverage historical experiences. Current memory systems enable basic storage and retrieval but lack sophisticated memory organization, despite recent attempts to incorporate graph dat…

    arXiv 2502.12110v11Meow summaryAgents
  28. Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory

    Prateek Chhikara, Dev Khant, Saket Aryan et al.

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable prowess in generating contextually coherent responses, yet their fixed context windows pose fundamental challenges for maintaining consistency over prolonged multi-session dialogues. We introduce Mem0, a scalable memory-centric architecture that addresses this…

    arXiv 2504.19413v1Meow summaryAgents
  29. Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces

    Mike A. Merrill, Alexander G. Shaw, Nicholas Carlini et al.

    AI agents may soon become capable of autonomously completing valuable, long-horizon tasks in diverse domains. Current benchmarks either do not measure real-world tasks, or are not sufficiently difficult to meaningfully measure frontier models. To this end, we present Terminal-Bench 2.0: a carefully curated hard benchm…

    arXiv 2601.11868v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  30. ARC-AGI-2 Technical Report

    Wallyson Lemes de Oliveira, Mekhron Bobokhonov, Matteo Caorsi et al.

    The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) is designed to assess generalization beyond pattern matching, requiring models to infer symbolic rules from very few examples. In this work, we present a transformer-based system that advances ARC performance by combining neural inference with structure-aware priors and onlin…

    arXiv 2603.06590v1Meow summaryEvaluation
  31. Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI

    Peter Belcak Greg Heinrich Shizhe Diao Yonggan Fu Xin Dong, Saurav Muralidharan Yingyan Celine Lin Pavlo Molchanov

    Large language models (LLMs) are often praised for exhibiting near-human performance on a wide range of tasks and valued for their ability to hold a general conversation. The rise of agentic AI systems is, however, ushering in a mass of applications in which language models perform a small number of specialized tasks…

    arXiv 2506.02153v3Meow summaryAgents
  32. Agent Lightning: Train ANY AI Agents with Reinforcement Learning

    Xufang Luo, Yuge Zhang, Zhiyuan He et al.

    We present Agent Lightning, a flexible and extensible framework that enables Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based training of Large Language Models (LLMs) for any AI agent. Unlike existing methods that tightly couple RL training with agent or rely on sequence concatenation with masking, Agent Lightning achieves complete…

    arXiv 2508.03680v1Meow summaryTraining agents
  33. rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking

    Xinyu Guan, Li Lyna Zhang, Yifei Liu et al.

    We present rStar-Math to demonstrate that small language models (SLMs) can rival or even surpass the math reasoning capability of OpenAI o1, without distillation from superior models. rStar-Math achieves this by exercising “deep thinking” through Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), where a math policy SLM performs test-ti…

    arXiv 2501.04519v1Meow summaryReasoning
  34. SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?

    Samuel Miserendino, Michele Wang, Tejal Patwardhan et al.

    We introduce SWE-Lancer, a benchmark of over 1,400 freelance software engineering tasks from Upwork, valued at \$1 million USD total in real-world payouts. SWE-Lancer encompasses both independent engineering tasks — ranging from \$50 bug fixes to \$32,000 feature implementations — and managerial tasks, where models ch…

    arXiv 2502.12115v4Meow summaryEvaluation
  35. Less is More: Recursive Reasoning with Tiny Networks

    Hierarchical Reasoning Model (HRM) is a novel approach using two small neural networks recursing at different frequencies. This biologically inspired method beats Large Language models (LLMs) on hard puzzle tasks such as Sudoku, Maze, and ARC-AGI while trained with small models (27M parameters) on small data ($\sim$ 1…

    arXiv 2510.04871v1Meow summaryReasoning
  36. Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threats

    Aengus Lynch, Benjamin Wright, Caleb Larson et al.

    We stress-tested 16 leading models from multiple developers in hypothetical corporate environments to identify potentially risky agentic behaviors before they cause real harm. In the scenarios, we allowed models to autonomously send emails and access sensitive information. They were assigned only harmless business goa…

    arXiv 2510.05179v2Meow summarySafety & security
  37. Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety

    Tomek Korbak UK AI Security Institute Mikita Balesni Apollo Research Elizabeth Barnes METR Yoshua Bengio University of Montreal & Mila Joe Benton Anthropic Joseph Bloom UK AI Security Institute Mark Chen OpenAI Alan Cooney UK AI Security Institute Allan Dafoe Google DeepMind Anca Dragan Google DeepMind Scott Emmons Google DeepMind Owain Evans Truthful AI & UC Berkeley David Farhi OpenAI Ryan Greenblatt Redwood Research Dan Hendrycks Center for AI Safety Marius Hobbhahn Apollo Research Evan Hubinger Anthropic Geoffrey Irving UK AI Security Institute Erik Jenner Google DeepMind Daniel Kokotajlo AI Futures Project Victoria Krakovna Google DeepMind Shane Legg Google DeepMind David Lindner Google DeepMind David Luan Amazon Aleksander Mądry OpenAI Julian Michael Scale AI Neel Nanda Google DeepMind Dave Orr Google DeepMind Jakub Pachocki OpenAI Ethan Perez Anthropic Mary Phuong Google DeepMind Fabien Roger Anthropic Joshua Saxe Meta Buck Shlegeris Redwood Research Martín Soto UK AI Security Institute Eric Steinberger Magic Jasmine Wang UK AI Security Institute Wojciech Zaremba OpenAI Bowen Baker OpenAI Rohin Shah Google DeepMind Vlad Mikulik Anthropic

    AI systems that “think” in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety: we can monitor their chains of thought (CoT) for the intent to misbehave. Like all other known AI oversight methods, CoT monitoring is imperfect and allows some misbehavior to go unnoticed. Nevertheless, it shows promise and we recomme…

    arXiv 2507.11473v2Meow summarySafety & security
  38. Auditing language models for hidden objectives

    Samuel Marks, Johannes Treutlein, Trenton Bricken, Jack Lindsey, Jonathan Marcus,

    We study the feasibility of conducting **alignment audits**: investigations into whether models have undesired objectives. As a testbed, we train a language model with a hidden objective. Our training pipeline first teaches the model about exploitable errors in RLHF reward models (RMs), then trains the model to exploi…

    arXiv 2503.10965v2Meow summarySafety & security