Open library

The library

The essential reading of generative AI and agents, open in a clean reading view, with Meow and Standard summaries when available. No account needed to read.

560 papers · 558 with a Meow summary · 333 posts

Every paper prepared on Reading + AI, newest first.

12 of 560 in this collection. Searches titles, authors, labs, arXiv IDs and summaries.

  1. EnvScaler: Scaling Tool-Interactive Environments for LLM Agent via Programmatic Synthesis

    Xiaoshuai Song, Haofei Chang, Guanting Dong et al.

    Large language models (LLMs) are expected to be trained to act as agents in various real-world environments, but this process relies on rich and varied tool-interaction sandboxes. However, access to real systems is often restricted; LLM-simulated environments are prone to hallucinations and inconsistencies; and manual…

    arXiv 2601.05808v2Meow summaryCode
  2. daVinci-Dev: Agent-native Mid-training for Software Engineering

    Ji Zeng, Dayuan Fu, Tiantian Mi et al.

    Recently, the frontier of Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities has shifted from single-turn code generation to agentic software engineering—a paradigm where models autonomously navigate, edit, and test complex repositories. While post-training methods have become the de facto approach for code agents, agentic mid-t…

    arXiv 2601.18418v2Meow summaryCode
  3. TermiGen: High-Fidelity Environment and Robust Trajectory Synthesis for Terminal Agents

    Kaijie Zhu, Yuzhou Nie, Yijiang Li et al.

    Executing complex terminal tasks remains a significant challenge for open-weight LLMs, constrained by two fundamental limitations. First, high-fidelity, executable training environments are scarce: environments synthesized from real-world repositories are not diverse and scalable, while trajectories synthesized by LLM…

    arXiv 2602.07274v1Meow summaryCode
  4. On Data Engineering for Scaling LLM Terminal Capabilities

    Renjie Pi, Grace Lam, Mohammad Shoeybi et al.

    Despite rapid recent progress in the terminal capabilities of large language models, the training data strategies behind state-of-the-art terminal agents remain largely undisclosed. We address this gap through a systematic study of data engineering practices for terminal agents, making two key contributions: (1) **Ter…

    arXiv 2602.21193v1Meow summaryCode
  5. Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation

    Ruixiang Zhang Richard He Bai Huangjie Zheng Navdeep Jaitly Ronan Collobert

    Can a large language model (LLM) improve at code generation using only its own raw outputs, without a verifier, a teacher model, or reinforcement learning? We answer in the affirmative with simple self-distillation (SSD): sample solutions from the model with certain temperature and truncation configurations, then fine…

    arXiv 2604.01193v2Meow summaryCode
  6. Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today’s and Future AI Agent Systems

    Jiacheng Liu, Xiaohan Zhao, Xinyi Shang et al.

    Claude Code is an agentic coding tool that can run shell commands, edit files, and call external services on behalf of the user. This study describes its comprehensive architecture by analyzing the publicly available TypeScript source code and further comparing it with two independent open-source AI agent systems, Ope…

    arXiv 2604.14228v3Meow summaryCode
  7. Recursive Synthesis for Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks

    Zhongzhi Li, Yucheng Shi, Zongxia Li et al.

    High-quality long-horizon training data for terminal agents is expensive to produce, often costing hundreds to thousands of dollars per task, because each task must keep the instruction, environment, reference solution, and verifier mutually consistent. Human authoring does not scale, and direct generation with large…

    arXiv 2608.05466v3Meow summaryCode
  8. Thinking in Uncertainty: Mitigating Hallucinations in MLRMs with Latent Entropy-Aware Decoding

    Zhongxing Xu, Zhonghua Wang, Zhe Qian et al.

    Recent advancements in multimodal large reasoning models (MLRMs) have significantly improved performance in visual question answering. However, we observe that transition words (e.g., because, however, and wait) are closely associated with hallucinations and tend to exhibit high-entropy states. We argue that adequate…

    arXiv 2603.13366v1Meow summaryCode
  9. Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code

    Baptiste Rozière, Jonas Gehring, Fabian Gloeckle et al.

    We release Code Llama, a family of large language models for code based on Llama 2 providing state-of-the-art performance among open models, infilling capabilities, support for large input contexts, and zero-shot instruction following ability for programming tasks. We provide multiple flavors to cover a wide range of…

    arXiv 2308.12950v3Meow summaryCode
  10. StarCoder: may the source be with you!

    The BigCode community, an open-scientific collaboration working on the responsible development of Large Language Models for Code (Code LLMs), introduces StarCoder and StarCoderBase: 15.5B parameter models with 8K context length, infilling capabilities and fast large-batch inference enabled by multi-query attention. St…

    arXiv 2305.06161v2Meow summaryCode
  11. Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode

    Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung et al.

    Programming is a powerful and ubiquitous problem-solving tool. Developing systems that can assist programmers or even generate programs independently could make programming more productive and accessible, yet so far incorporating innovations in AI has proven challenging. Recent large-scale language models have demonst…

    arXiv 2203.07814v1Meow summaryCode