Open library

The library

The essential reading of generative AI and agents, open in a clean reading view, with Meow and Standard summaries when available. No account needed to read.

560 papers · 558 with a Meow summary · 333 posts

The selected papers and blogs: the essential papers of generative AI and agents, and the key lab publications and essays, each with Meow and Standard summaries.

24 of 839 in this collection. Searches titles, authors, labs, arXiv IDs and summaries.

  1. Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT

    Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian et al.

    We analyze the storage and recall of factual associations in autoregressive transformer language models, finding evidence that these associations correspond to localized, directly-editable computations. We first develop a causal intervention for identifying neuron activations that are decisive in a model’s factual pre…

    arXiv 2202.05262v5Meow summaryInterpretability
  2. Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small

    Kevin Wang, Alexandre Variengien, Arthur Conmy, Buck Shlegeris & Jacob Steinhardt

    Research in mechanistic interpretability seeks to explain behaviors of machine learning (ML) models in terms of their internal components. However, most previous work either focuses on simple behaviors in small models or describes complicated behaviors in larger models with broad strokes. In this work, we bridge this…

    arXiv 2211.00593v1Meow summaryInterpretability
  3. Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability

    Arthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch et al.

    Through considerable effort and intuition, several recent works have reverse-engineered nontrivial behaviors of transformer models. This paper systematizes the mechanistic interpretability process they followed. First, researchers choose a metric and dataset that elicit the desired model behavior. Then, they apply act…

    arXiv 2304.14997v4Meow summaryInterpretability
  4. Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency

    Andy Zou, Long Phan, Sarah Chen et al.

    We identify and characterize the emerging area of representation engineering (RepE), an approach to enhancing the transparency of AI systems that draws on insights from cognitive neuroscience. RepE places representations, rather than neurons or circuits, at the center of analysis, equipping us with novel methods for m…

    arXiv 2310.01405v4Meow summaryInterpretability
  5. Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision

    Collin Burns, Haotian Ye, Dan Klein et al.

    Existing techniques for training language models can be misaligned with the truth: if we train models with imitation learning, they may reproduce errors that humans make; if we train them to generate text that humans rate highly, they may output errors that human evaluators can’t detect. We propose circumventing this…

    arXiv 2212.03827v2Meow summaryInterpretability
  6. Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders

    Leo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman et al.

    Sparse autoencoders provide a promising unsupervised approach for extracting interpretable features from a language model by reconstructing activations from a sparse bottleneck layer. Since language models learn many concepts, autoencoders need to be very large to recover all relevant features. However, studying the p…

    arXiv 2406.04093v1Meow summaryInterpretability
  7. The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in LLM Representations of True/False Datasets

    Samuel Marks, Max Tegmark

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities, but are prone to outputting falsehoods. Recent work has developed techniques for inferring whether a LLM is telling the truth by training probes on the LLM’s internal activations. However, this line of work is controversial, with some authors pointing out fail…

    arXiv 2310.06824v3Meow summaryInterpretability
  8. Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction

    Andy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed et al.

    Conversational large language models are fine-tuned for both instruction-following and safety, resulting in models that obey benign requests but refuse harmful ones. While this refusal behavior is widespread across chat models, its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we show that refusal is m…

    arXiv 2406.11717v3Meow summaryInterpretability
  9. persona vectors: monitoring and controlling character traits in language models

    Runjin Chen, Andy Arditi, Henry Sleight et al.

    Large language models interact with users through a simulated “Assistant” persona. While the Assistant is typically trained to be helpful, harmless, and honest, it sometimes deviates from these ideals. In this paper, we identify directions in the model’s activation space—persona vectors—underlying several traits, such…

    arXiv 2507.21509v3Meow summaryInterpretability
  10. Mapping the mind of a large language model

    Anthropic

    Anthropic reports that changing identified features changed Claude’s behavior, making internal representations potential safety probes—but not yet a proven safety fix.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  11. Tracing the thoughts of a large language model

    Anthropic

    Circuit tracing reveals parts of Claude’s internal computation, including advance planning and cases where its stated reasoning diverges from the mechanisms researchers observe.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  12. Emergent introspective awareness in LLMs

    Anthropic

    Anthropic reports that Claude models can sometimes detect and influence their own internal representations. The ability is unreliable and does not establish human-like introspection or consciousness.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  13. Emotion concepts in a large language model

    Anthropic

    Emotion labels here describe measurable patterns inside Claude Sonnet 4.5—not evidence that it has subjective feelings.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  14. Natural Language Autoencoders

    Anthropic

    Natural Language Autoencoders turn model activations into readable clues, giving safety researchers another way to inspect what Claude does not say. Their value depends on treating those clues cautiously.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  15. The assistant axis

    Anthropic

    The authors identify an “Assistant Axis” linked to model persona, and report that capping activity beyond its usual range can reduce harmful responses while preserving capability-benchmark performance.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  16. Feature Visualization

    Chris Olah · Distill

    Feature visualization creates inputs that show what a network responds to, but raw optimization can exploit high-frequency artifacts; useful interpretations need diversity and constraints.

    distill.pubSummariesInterpretability
  17. The Building Blocks of Interpretability

    Chris Olah · Distill

    What could an explanation show if it followed a network’s learned concepts, not just highlighted pixels?

    distill.pubSummariesInterpretability
  18. Dario Amodei — The Urgency of Interpretability

    Dario Amodei

    Amodei argues that interpretability could help steer AI’s deployment, but its diagnostic tools must advance before models become more capable.

    darioamodei.comSummariesInterpretability
  19. A global workspace in language models

    Anthropic

    A silent, word-linked J-space appears to carry some of Claude’s deliberate reasoning—and interventions show that changing it can change answers.

    anthropic.comSummariesInterpretability
  20. DeepSeek-V4-Flash means LLM steering is interesting again

    Sean Goedecke

    Steering changes a model’s internal activations, and DeepSeek V4 Flash makes it easier to try locally. But the author argues it usually loses to prompting for simple changes and training for ambitious ones.

    seangoedecke.comSummariesInterpretability