Reading + AI

Radiative leptonic decays on the lattice

Christopher Kane, Christoph Lehner, Amarjit Soni

arXiv:1907.00279v2 · This workspace stays on this version. Check arXiv for newer versions

Affiliations and author notes
  • Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
  • Department of Physics, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany
  • Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
  • RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USAE-mail:
  • smeinel@email.arizona.edu
Some source details need review 1 to check

Original formulas, table values and figures are preserved. Comparison can miss differences; use the original PDF to check details.

Reading view checked: 143 math expressions, 3 rendering failures; 5 of 5 images available.

Compared 34 of 34 source passages against 7 of 7 PDF pages.

  • Some formulas could not be rendered; their original TeX is shown. Check the original PDF. (3)

5 of 5 figure, table and graphic images captured. Open original PDF

Abstract

Adding a hard photon to the final state of a leptonic pseudoscalar-meson decay lifts the helicity suppression and can provide sensitivity to a larger set of operators in the weak effective Hamiltonian. Furthermore, radiative leptonic BB decays at high photon energy are well suited to constrain the first inverse moment of the BB-meson light-cone distribution amplitude, an important parameter in the theory of nonleptonic BB decays. We demonstrate that the calculation of radiative leptonic decays is possible using Euclidean lattice QCD, and present preliminary numerical results for Ds+→ℓ+νγ  D_{s}^{+}\to\ell^{+}\nu\gamma\>\> and   K−→ℓ−νˉγ\>\>K^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Left: A diagram contributing to B−→ℓ−νˉ γB^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\,\gamma, where the green square corresponds to WW-boson exchange in the Standard Model and comes with a factor of VubV_{ub}. Right: two diagrams contributing to Bs→ℓ+ℓ−γB_{s}\to\ell^{+}\ell^{-}\gamma, via the operators O7,9,10O_{7,9,10} (defined, for example, in Ref. [1]).

Radiative leptonic decays of pseudoscalar mesons probe both the weak interaction and the hadronic structure in useful ways. Adding a sufficiently energetic photon to the final state can actually increase the branching fraction [2], as it removes the helicity suppression. Perhaps the most interesting example is B−→ℓ−νˉ γB^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\,\gamma, shown in Fig. 1 (left). For large Eγ(0)E_{\gamma}^{(0)}, this process is the cleanest probe of the first inverse moment of the BB-meson light-cone distribution amplitude, 1/λB=∫0∞ΦB+(ω)ω dω1/\lambda_{B}=\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\Phi_{B^{+}}(\omega)}{\omega}\>d\omega, an important input in QCD-factorization predictions for nonleptonic BB decays that is presently poorly determined [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. A recent search for this decay by Belle gave an upper limit B(B−→ℓ−νˉγ, Eγ(0)>1 GeV)<3.0×10−6\mathcal{B}(B^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma,\>E_{\gamma}^{(0)}>1\>{\rm GeV})<3.0\times 10^{-6}, close to the Standard-Model expectation [10]. Lattice QCD results for the B−→ℓ−νˉγB^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma form factors could be used to constrain λB\lambda_{B}. Also very interesting are the flavor-changing neutral-current decays B0→ℓ+ℓ−γB^{0}\to\ell^{+}\ell^{-}\gamma and Bs→ℓ+ℓ−γB_{s}\to\ell^{+}\ell^{-}\gamma (shown in Fig. 1, right). While the purely leptonic decays are sensitive to C10,S,P−C10,S,P′C_{10,S,P}-C^{\prime}_{10,S,P} only, the radiative leptonic decays probe all Wilson coefficients in the weak effective Hamiltonian, including C9C_{9}, in which global fits of experimental results for other b→sℓ+ℓ−b\to s\ell^{+}\ell^{-} decays indicate a deviation from the Standard Model that violates lepton flavor universality (LFU) [1]. Since the radiative leptonic decays are not helicity-suppressed, they are well-suited for testing LFU with light leptons [11, 12]. For the charmed-meson radiative leptonic decays D+→e+νγD^{+}\to e^{+}\nu\gamma and Ds+→e+νγD_{s}^{+}\to e^{+}\nu\gamma, the BESIII collaboration has reported upper limits on the branching fractions with Eγ(0)>10 MeVE_{\gamma}^{(0)}>10\>{\rm MeV} of 3.0×10−53.0\times 10^{-5} and 1.3×10−41.3\times 10^{-4}, respectively [13, 14]. Finally, in contrast to the heavy-meson decays, there are already precise measurements of the differential branching fractions of K−→e−νˉγK^{-}\to e^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma, K−→μ−νˉγK^{-}\to\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma, π−→e−νˉγ\pi^{-}\to e^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma, and π−→μ−νˉγ\pi^{-}\to\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma, as reviewed in Ref. [15]. These decay modes can therefore be used to test the lattice QCD methods.

In the following, we show how radiative leptonic decays can be calculated on a Euclidean lattice, and we present early numerical results. One of us previously reported on this project at the Lattice 2018 conference [16]. At Lattice 2019, radiative leptonic decays were also discussed by G. Martinelli [17].

To define the form factors for charged-current radiative leptonic decays of pseudoscalar mesons, we use the notation for B−→ℓ−νˉ γB^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\,\gamma. The quark electromagnetic and weak currents are given by Jμ=∑qeq qˉγμqJ_{\mu}=\sum_{q}e_{q}\,\bar{q}\gamma_{\mu}q and Jνweak=uˉγν(1−γ5)bJ^{\rm weak}_{\nu}=\bar{u}\gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma_{5})b. The decay amplitude depends on the hadronic tensor, which is defined as

Tμν=−i∫d4x  eipγ⋅x⟨0∣T(Jμ(x) Jνweak(0))∣B−(pB)⟩\begin{aligned}\displaystyle T_{\mu\nu} & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle-i\int d^{4}x\>\>e^{ip_{\gamma}\cdot x}\langle 0|\mathsf{T}\left(J_{\mu}(x)\>J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)\right)|B^{-}(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle\end{aligned}
(1)

in Minkowski space. Throughout this work, we asssume that the photon is real, i.e., pγ2=0p_{\gamma}^{2}=0. The hadronic tensor can be decomposed as [7]

\begin{aligned}\displaystyle T_{\mu\nu} & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle\epsilon_{\mu\nu\tau\rho}p_{\gamma}^{\tau}{\textsl{v}}^{\,\rho}{F_{V}}+i[-g_{\mu\nu}(p_{\gamma}\cdot{\textsl{v}})+{\textsl{v}}_{\mu}(p_{\gamma})_{\nu}]{F_{A}}-i\frac{{\textsl{v}}_{\mu}{\textsl{v}}_{\nu}}{p_{\gamma}\cdot{\textsl{v}}}m_{B}{f_{B}}+(p_{\gamma})_{\mu}\text{-terms},\end{aligned}\tag{(2)}

where p_{B}=m_{B}{\textsl{v}} and the (pγ)μ-terms(p_{\gamma})_{\mu}\text{-terms} will disappear when contracting with the photon polarization vector. The form factors FVF_{V} and FAF_{A} are functions of the photon energy in the BB-meson rest frame, E_{\gamma}^{(0)}=p_{\gamma}\cdot{\textsl{v}}=(m_{B}^{2}-q^{2})/(2m_{B}). Also appearing in Eq. (2) is the BB-meson decay constant fBf_{B}.

To prepare for the discussion in the next section, it is useful to write down the spectral representation of TμνT_{\mu\nu} in Minkowski space for the two different time orderings of the currents. By inserting complete sets of energy/momentum eigenstates and performing the time integrals, we find

Tμν<=−i∫−∞(1−iϵ)0dteiEγt∫d3x  e−ipγ⋅x⟨0∣Jνweak(0) Jμ(t,x)∣B−(pB)⟩=−∑n12En,(pB−pγ)⟨0∣Jνweak(0)∣n(pB−pγ)⟩⟨n(pB−pγ)∣Jμ(0)∣B(pB)⟩Eγ+En,(pB−pγ)−EB−iϵ,\begin{aligned}\displaystyle T^{<}_{\mu\nu} & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle-i\int_{-\infty(1-i\epsilon)}^{0}\hskip-8.61108ptdt\hskip 8.61108pte^{iE_{\gamma}t}\int d^{3}x\>\>e^{-i\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\langle 0|J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)\>J_{\mu}(t,\mathbf{x})|B^{-}(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle \\ & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle-\sum_{n}\frac{1}{2E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}}\frac{\langle 0|J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)|n(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})\rangle\langle n(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})|J_{\mu}(0)|B(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle}{E_{\gamma}+E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}-E_{B}-i\epsilon},\end{aligned}
(3)
Tμν>=−i∫0∞(1−iϵ)dteiEγt∫d3x  e−ipγ⋅x⟨0∣Jμ(t,x) Jνweak(0)∣B−(pB)⟩=∑m12Em,pγ⟨0∣Jμ(0)∣m(pγ)⟩⟨m(pγ)∣Jνweak(0)∣B(pB)⟩Eγ−Em,pγ−iϵ\begin{aligned}\displaystyle T^{>}_{\mu\nu} & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle-i\int_{0}^{\infty(1-i\epsilon)}\hskip-8.61108ptdt\hskip 8.61108pte^{iE_{\gamma}t}\int d^{3}x\>\>e^{-i\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\langle 0|J_{\mu}(t,\mathbf{x})\>J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)|B^{-}(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle \\ & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle\sum_{m}\frac{1}{2E_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}}}\frac{\langle 0|J_{\mu}(0)|m(\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})\rangle\langle m(\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})|J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)|B(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle}{E_{\gamma}-E_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}}-i\epsilon}\end{aligned}
(4)

(in infinite volume, the sums over nn and mm include integrals over the continuous spectrum of multi-particle states).

In this section, we show that TμνT_{\mu\nu} can be extracted from the Euclidean three-point function

Cμν(t,tB)=∫d3x∫d3y  e−ipγ⋅xeipB⋅y⟨Jμ(t,x)  Jνweak(0,0)  ϕB†(tB,y)⟩,\begin{aligned}\displaystyle C_{\mu\nu}(t,t_{B}) & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle\int d^{3}x\int d^{3}y\>\>e^{-i\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}\cdot\mathbf{x}}e^{i\mathbf{p}_{B}\cdot\mathbf{y}}\left\langle J_{\mu}(t,\mathbf{x})\>\>J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0,\mathbf{0})\>\>\phi_{B}^{\dagger}(t_{B},\mathbf{y})\right\rangle,\end{aligned}
(5)

where ϕB∼uˉγ5b\phi_{B}\sim\bar{u}\gamma_{5}b is an interpolating field for the BB meson, and tt, tBt_{B} now denote the Euclidean time. We define the integrals

Iμν<(tB,T)=∫− ⁣T0dt  eEγt Cμν(t,tB),Iμν>(tB,T)=∫0Tdt  eEγt Cμν(t,tB),I^{<}_{\mu\nu}(t_{B},T)=\int_{-\!T}^{0}dt\>\>e^{E_{\gamma}t}\>C_{\mu\nu}(t,t_{B}),\hskip 21.52771ptI^{>}_{\mu\nu}(t_{B},T)=\int_{0}^{T}dt\>\>e^{E_{\gamma}t}\>C_{\mu\nu}(t,t_{B}),
(6)

with a finite integration range TT. Here we take tBt_{B} to be large and negative (with tB<−Tt_{B}<-T), such that ground-state saturation is achieved for the BB meson. Inserting again complete sets of energy/momentum eigenstates, we find, for the first time ordering,

Iμν<(tB,T)=⟨B(pB)∣ϕB†(0)∣0⟩12EBeEBtB×∑n12En,(pB−pγ)⟨0∣Jνweak(0)∣n(pB−pγ)⟩⟨n(pB−pγ)∣Jμ(0)∣B(pB)⟩Eγ+En,(pB−pγ)−EB×(1−e−(Eγ+En,(pB−pγ)−EB)T).\begin{aligned}\displaystyle I^{<}_{\mu\nu}(t_{B},T) & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle\langle B(\mathbf{p}_{B})|\phi_{B}^{\dagger}(0)|0\rangle\frac{1}{2E_{B}}e^{E_{B}t_{B}} \\ & & \displaystyle\times\sum_{n}\frac{1}{2E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}}\frac{\langle 0|J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)|n(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})\rangle\langle n(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})|J_{\mu}(0)|B(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle}{E_{\gamma}+E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}-E_{B}} \\ & & \displaystyle\times\left(1-e^{-(E_{\gamma}+E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}-E_{B})T}\right).\end{aligned}
(7)

The sum over states in Eq. (7) differs from the sum in Eq. (3) by the factor in the last line. However, the exponential e−(Eγ+En,(pB−pγ)−EB)Te^{-(E_{\gamma}+E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}-E_{B})T} will vanish for large TT if Eγ+En,(pB−pγ)>EBE_{\gamma}+E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}>E_{B}. Because the states ∣n(pB−pγ)⟩|n(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})\rangle have the same quark-flavor quantum numbers as the BB meson, we have En,(pB−pγ)≥EB,(pB−pγ)=mB2+(pB−pγ)2E_{n,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}\geq E_{B,(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})}=\sqrt{m_{B}^{2}+(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})^{2}}. Thus, we need pγ2+mB2+(pB−pγ)2>mB2+pB2\displaystyle\sqrt{\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}^{2}}+\sqrt{m_{B}^{2}+(\mathbf{p}_{B}-\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})^{2}}>\sqrt{m_{B}^{2}+\mathbf{p}_{B}^{2}}. This is in fact always true if pγ≠0\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}\neq 0.

For the other time ordering, we find

Iμν>(tB,T)=−⟨B(pB)∣ϕB†(0)∣0⟩12EBeEBtB×∑m12Em,pγ⟨0∣Jμ(0)∣m(pγ)⟩⟨m(pγ)∣Jνweak(0)∣B(pB)⟩Eγ−Em,pγ(1−e(Eγ−Em,pγ)T).\begin{aligned}\displaystyle I^{>}_{\mu\nu}(t_{B},T) & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle-\langle B(\mathbf{p}_{B})|\phi_{B}^{\dagger}(0)|0\rangle\frac{1}{2E_{B}}e^{E_{B}t_{B}} \\ & & \displaystyle\times\sum_{m}\frac{1}{2E_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}}}\frac{\langle 0|J_{\mu}(0)|m(\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})\rangle\langle m(\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})|J^{\rm weak}_{\nu}(0)|B(\mathbf{p}_{B})\rangle}{E_{\gamma}-E_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}}}\left(1-e^{(E_{\gamma}-E_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}})T}\right).\end{aligned}
(8)

The unwanted exponential e(Eγ−Em,pγ)Te^{(E_{\gamma}-E_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}})T} in the last line goes to zero for large TT if Em,pγ>EγE_{m,\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}}>E_{\gamma}. Because the states ∣m(pγ)⟩|m(\mathbf{p}_{\gamma})\rangle are hadronic and have nonzero masses, their energies are larger than the energy of a photon with the same spatial momentum, showing that this condition is also always satisfied. In summary, for pγ≠0\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}\neq 0,

Tμν=−lim⁡T→∞  lim⁡tB→−∞2EB e−EBtB⟨B(pB)∣ϕB†(0)∣0⟩Iμν(tB,T),\begin{aligned}\displaystyle T_{\mu\nu} & \displaystyle= & \displaystyle-\lim_{T\to\infty}\>\>\lim_{t_{B}\to-\infty}\frac{2E_{B}\,e^{-E_{B}t_{B}}}{\langle B(\mathbf{p}_{B})|\phi_{B}^{\dagger}(0)|0\rangle}I_{\mu\nu}(t_{B},T),\end{aligned}
(9)

where IμνI_{\mu\nu} is the integral from −T-T to TT. The energy EBE_{B} and the overlap factor ⟨B(pB)∣ϕB†(0)∣0⟩\langle B(\mathbf{p}_{B})|\phi_{B}^{\dagger}(0)|0\rangle can be obtained from the two-point function ∫d3x  e−ipB⋅x⟨ϕB(t,x) ϕB†(0)⟩\int d^{3}x\>\>e^{-i\mathbf{p}_{B}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\langle\phi_{B}(t,\mathbf{x})\>\phi_{B}^{\dagger}(0)\rangle.

Note that similar nonlocal matrix elements appear in processes with two photons, whose lattice calculation has been discussed, for example, in Refs. [18, 19, 20].

Figure 2
Figure 2: The unintegrated, scaled three-point functions −2 EDs e−EDstDs⟨Ds(pDs)∣ϕDs†(0)∣0⟩Cμν(t,tDs)-\frac{2\,E_{D_{s}}\,e^{-E_{D_{s}}t_{D_{s}}}}{\langle D_{s}(\mathbf{p}_{D_{s}})|\phi_{D_{s}}^{\dagger}(0)|0\rangle}C_{\mu\nu}(t,t_{D_{s}}) as a function of the electromagnetic-current insertion time tt, for tDs/a=−12t_{D_{s}}/a=-12 and pγ=(0,0,1)2πL\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}=(0,0,1)\frac{2\pi}{L}. The left plot shows a combination of indices sensitive to FVF_{V}, while the right plot shows a combination sensitive to FAF_{A}. The contributions from the ss and cc quark in the electromagnetic current are shown separately, without charge factors.
Figure 3
Figure 3: The Ds+→ℓ+νγD_{s}^{+}\to\ell^{+}\nu\gamma and K−→ℓ−νˉγK^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma form factors at pγ=(0,0,1)2πL\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}=(0,0,1)\frac{2\pi}{L} as a function of the summation range TT, for two different meson-field insertion times.
Figure 4
Figure 4: The DsD_{s} and KK decay constants extracted from TμνT_{\mu\nu} at pγ=(0,0,1)2πL\mathbf{p}_{\gamma}=(0,0,1)\frac{2\pi}{L}, as a function of the summation range TT, for two different meson-field insertion times. For the DsD_{s}, the horizontal line shows the physical value from Ref. [21]. For the KK, the horizontal line shows the value computed on the same ensemble with the standard method in Ref. [22].

In this section, we present some early numerical results for the Ds+→ℓ+νγD_{s}^{+}\to\ell^{+}\nu\gamma and K−→ℓ−νˉγK^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma form factors. These results are from only 25 configurations of the “24I” RBC/UKQCD ensemble [22] with 2+12+1 flavors of domain-wall fermions and the Iwasaki gauge action, with a−1=1.785(5)a^{-1}=1.785(5) GeV and mπ=340(1)m_{\pi}=340(1) MeV. For the light and strange valence quarks, we use the same domain-wall action as in Ref. [22]. The valence charm quark is implemented with a Möbius domain-wall action with stout-smeared gauge links (N=3N=3, ρ=0.1\rho=0.1), L5/a=12L_{5}/a=12, aM5=1.0aM_{5}=1.0, amf=0.6am_{f}=0.6 [23], which approximately corresponds to the physical charm-quark mass. We use local currents with “mostly nonperturbative” renormalization. Gaussian smearing is performed for the lighter quark in the meson interpolating field. We start with a Z2\mathbb{Z}_{2} random-wall source at the time slice of the weak current (denoted as time “0” here) and perform sequential inversions through the meson interpolating field; disconnected diagrams are presently neglected. All-mode averaging [24] with 16 sloppy and 1 exact samples per configuration is employed; the 16 sloppy samples correspond to 16 different starting time slices. Our initial calculations used pK/Ds=0\mathbf{p}_{K/D_{s}}=0 and pγ2∈{1,2,3,4,5}(2πL)2\mathbf{p}^{2}_{\gamma}\in\{1,2,3,4,5\}\left(\frac{2\pi}{L}\right)^{2}.

Figure 5
Figure 5: The Ds+→ℓ+νγD_{s}^{+}\to\ell^{+}\nu\gamma and K−→ℓ−νˉγK^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma form factors as a function of the photon energy. The results shown here were obtained with T/a=8T/a=8 and tK/Ds/a=−12t_{K/D_{s}}/a=-12. Only the statistical uncertainties are given.

Figure 2 shows examples of the Ds+→ℓ+νγD_{s}^{+}\to\ell^{+}\nu\gamma three-point functions. Multiplying by eEγte^{E_{\gamma}t} and summing over tt gives TμνT_{\mu\nu} for sufficiently large summation range TT. The form factors FVF_{V} and FAF_{A} extracted from TμνT_{\mu\nu} (at the lowest photon momentum) are shown as a function of TT in Fig. 3. The results plateau at approximately T/a=8T/a=8. We also extracted the meson decay constants from the vμvνv^{\mu}v^{\nu} term in TμνT_{\mu\nu}. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the results agree with the known values, which is a valuable test of our calculation. Finally, Fig. 5 shows the form factors FVF_{V} and FAF_{A} as a function of the photon energy. Note that, with our current choice of momenta, all of the photon energies are above the physical region for K−→ℓ−νˉγK^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma. The results for FAF_{A} are dominated by the point-like contribution equal to −eℓfK/Ds/Eγ(0)-e_{\ell}f_{K/D_{s}}/E_{\gamma}^{(0)}.

We have shown that the form factors describing radiative leptonic decays can be calculated on the lattice; even though they involve a nonlocal matrix element, the use of imaginary time poses no difficulty in this case. The early results shown here for Ds+→ℓ+νγD_{s}^{+}\to\ell^{+}\nu\gamma and K−→ℓ−νˉγK^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma cover photon energies from approximately 0.5 to 1 GeV. For K−→ℓ−νˉγK^{-}\to\ell^{-}\bar{\nu}\gamma we need to reach lower photon energies to compare with experiment; this can be achieved by using moving frames (i.e., nonzero pK\mathbf{p}_{K}) and/or a larger volume. To study the B(s)B_{(s)} radiative leptonic decays with the domain-wall action for the heavy quark, we will need to extrapolate in the mass. We are also considering calculations directly at the physical bb-quark mass using the “relativistic heavy-quark action” [25], but, because this action is only on-shell improved, additional steps are likely needed to remove unphysical behavior occurring when the electromagnetic and weak currents get close to each other.

Acknowledgments: We thank the RBC and UKQCD Collaborations for providing the gauge-field configurations. C.K. and S.M. are supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Office of HEP under award number DE-SC0009913. S.M. is also supported by the RIKEN BNL Research Center. A.S. and C.L. are supported in part by US DOE Contract No. DESC0012704(BNL). During a part of this work, C.L. was also supported by a DOE Office of Science Early Career Award. This work used resources at TACC that are part of XSEDE, supported by NSF grant number ACI-1548562.

References

  1. [1] J. Aebischer, W. Altmannshofer, D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, P. Stangl, and D. M. Straub, “$B$-decay discrepancies after Moriond 2019,” arXiv:1903.10434.Source
  2. [2] D. Atwood, G. Eilam, and A. Soni, “Pure leptonic radiative decays $B^{\pm},D_{s}\to\ell\nu\gamma$ and the annihilation graph,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A11 (1996) 1061, arXiv:hep-ph/9411367.SourceSource
  3. [3] G. P. Korchemsky, D. Pirjol, and T.-M. Yan, “Radiative leptonic decays of B mesons in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 114510, arXiv:hep-ph/9911427.SourceSource
  4. [4] S. Descotes-Genon and C. T. Sachrajda, “Factorization, the light cone distribution amplitude of the B meson and the radiative decay $B\to\gamma\ell\nu_{\ell}$,” [Nucl. Phys. B650 (2003) 356](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)01066-0), arXiv:hep-ph/0209216.SourceSource
  5. [5] E. Lunghi, D. Pirjol, and D. Wyler, “Factorization in leptonic radiative $B\to\gamma e\nu$ decays,” [Nucl. Phys. B649 (2003) 349](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)01032-5), arXiv:hep-ph/0210091.SourceSource
  6. [6] V. M. Braun and A. Khodjamirian, “Soft contribution to $B\to\gamma\ell\nu_{\ell}$ and the $B$-meson distribution amplitude,” Phys. Lett. B718 (2013) 1014, arXiv:1210.4453.SourceSource
  7. [7] M. Beneke, V. M. Braun, Y. Ji, and Y.-B. Wei, “Radiative leptonic decay $B\to\gamma\ell\nu_{\ell}$ with subleading power corrections,” [JHEP 07 (2018) 154](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)154), arXiv:1804.04962.SourceSource
  8. [8] Y.-M. Wang and Y.-L. Shen, “Subleading-power corrections to the radiative leptonic $B\to\gamma\ell\nu$ decay in QCD,” [JHEP 05 (2018) 184](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)184), arXiv:1803.06667.SourceSource
  9. [9] M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, “QCD factorization for $B\to\pi\pi$ decays: Strong phases and CP violation in the heavy quark limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1914, arXiv:hep-ph/9905312.SourceSource
  10. [10] Belle Collaboration, M. Gelb et al., “Search for the rare decay of $B^{+}\to\ell^{\,+}\nu_{\ell}\gamma$ with improved hadronic tagging,” Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 112016, arXiv:1810.12976.SourceSource
  11. [11] D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, and R. Zwicky, “$B_{s}^{0}\to\ell^{+}\ell^{-}\gamma$ as a test of lepton flavor universality,” [JHEP 11 (2017) 184](http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)184), arXiv:1708.02649.SourceSource
  12. [12] F. Dettori, D. Guadagnoli, and M. Reboud, “$B^{0}_{s}\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-}\gamma$ from $B^{0}_{s}\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$,” Phys. Lett. B768 (2017) 163, arXiv:1610.00629.SourceSource
  13. [13] BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., “Search for the radiative leptonic decay $D^{+}\to\gamma e^{+}{\nu}_{e}$,” Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 071102, arXiv:1702.05837.SourceSource
  14. [14] BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., “Search for the decay $D_{s}^{+}\rightarrow\gamma e^{+}\nu_{e}$,” Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 072002, arXiv:1902.03351.SourceSource
  15. [15] Particle Data Group Collaboration, M. Tanabashi et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 030001.Source
  16. [16] A. Soni, “Flavor anomalies & the lattice,” 2018. Presentation at Lattice 2018, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  17. [17] RM123 Collaboration, G. Martinelli, “Electromagnetic Corrections to Decay Amplitudes: Real Emissions in Leptonic Decays,” 2019. Presentation at Lattice 2019, Wuhan, China.
  18. [18] X.-d. Ji and C.-w. Jung, “Studying hadronic structure of the photon in lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 208, arXiv:hep-lat/0101014.SourceSource
  19. [19] J. J. Dudek and R. G. Edwards, “Two Photon Decays of Charmonia from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 172001, arXiv:hep-ph/0607140.SourceSource
  20. [20] X. Feng, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, J.-i. Noaki, and E. Shintani, “Two-photon decay of the neutral pion in lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 182001, arXiv:1206.1375.SourceSource
  21. [21] Flavour Lattice Averaging Group Collaboration, S. Aoki et al., “FLAG Review 2019,” arXiv:1902.08191.Source
  22. [22] RBC/UKQCD Collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., “Continuum Limit Physics from 2+1 Flavor Domain Wall QCD,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 074508, arXiv:1011.0892.SourceSource
  23. [23] RBC/UKQCD Collaboration, P. A. Boyle, L. Del Debbio, N. Garron, A. Jüttner, A. Soni, J. T. Tsang, and O. Witzel, “SU(3)-breaking ratios for $D_{(s)}$ and $B_{(s)}$ mesons,” arXiv:1812.08791.Source
  24. [24] E. Shintani, R. Arthur, T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, C. Jung, and C. Lehner, “Covariant approximation averaging,” Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 114511, arXiv:1402.0244.SourceSource
  25. [25] N. H. Christ, M. Li, and H.-W. Lin, “Relativistic Heavy Quark Effective Action,” Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 074505, arXiv:hep-lat/0608006.SourceSource