Loading the edition…
· Past edition · 9 stories
Retrospective edition reconstructed from later captures. Paper versions may include later updates; coverage labels describe the evidence used.
Agent frameworks & orchestration
The FAQ’s central recommendation is to build product evaluations from real failure patterns—not generic metrics or failures you only imagine.
Why it matters: This approach directs effort toward problems users actually encounter. It also helps teams choose inexpensive code checks where rules are objective, reserve LLM judges for subjective failures, and test those judges against human labels before relying on their scores.
Agent frameworks & orchestration
Open each story in the reader. Summaries are shown when available; some sources provide an abstract only. With an account you can keep your own notes.
The captured HN discussion frames coding-agent harnesses as conditional design choices, but the linked study itself was not fetched.
Why it matters: The comments suggest testing harness components against the target model, task, and resource budget instead of assuming that more tools or planning always help.